I saw Roberts post this morning - I didn’t give it any thoughts besides that Robert is ranting - again - about what should be developed at MS and what in fact is already been done elsewhere.
Now Fredrik came across a post from one of Scobles Colleagues and it raises in fact some fundamental questions - Fredrik has them already so I won’t repeat them here.
I think that one of Roberts main questions to him self must be - which I’m sure he already answered himself, I hope so - what he in fact wanted to achieve with his post. He is synonymous with transparency and gives MSN a face, a voice, but how far will management go if it causes internal revolt?
If
One Comment
Is it just me, or are we beginning to talk inside-the-box old-fashioned business processes again? Didn’t we learn anything after the last bubble, or do we just want to make another for fun?
Blogging is not to be controlled, not even if it makes internal revolt. I agree a Code of Conduct is helpful, but that’s as far as it goes. We’ll have to be all Locke-inspired here and think worst case = best case.
Incoming Links
Leave a Reply